TOMORROW is nomination day for the 2008 general election. Hundreds of candidates will vie for the 191 parliamentary seats and 505 state seats in Peninsular Malaysia and Sabah, and 31 parliamentary seats in Sarawak.
However, one hopes no candidate will make any mistake on his nomination papers.
Under Article 47 of the Constitution, a nominated candidate must be a citizen of 21 years old who is a resident here.
Article 48 then provides that he is disqualified if:
(a) he is of unsound mind; or
(b) he is an undischarged bank-rupt; or
(c) he holds an office of profit; or
(d) he has failed to lodge any return of election expenses unless this disqualification is removed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or five years have passed from the date on which the return was required to be lodged; or
(e) he has been convicted of an offence by a court of law and sentenced to imprisonment for a term of not less than one year or to a fine of not less than RM2,000 and has not received a free pardon unless this disqualification is removed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or five years have passed from the date on which the person convicted was released from custody or the date on which the fine mentioned was imposed on such person; or
(f) he has voluntarily acquired citizenship of or exercised rights of citizenship in a foreign country or he has made a declaration of allegiance to any other country; or
(g) he has resigned from the Dewan Rakyat less than five years ago.
Article 49 of the Constitution also prohibits a member of the senate to stand for election unless he has first resigned from the senate.
In addition, if the candidate is standing for a state seat, the state constitution also requires him to be a resident of that state. In Abdul Fattah Mogawan & Anor v MMC Power Sdn Bhd & Anor 1997, the word "resident" was judicially considered to denote a person's home.
Article 160 defines the phrase "office of profit" as any full-time office in any of the public services. The phrase "public services" is defined in Article 132.
In Lee Hie Kui @ Eric Lee v Song Swee Guan & Anor 1998, it was held that the office of a mayor is not an "office of profit".
One piece of legislation which a candidate must know is the Elections (Conduct of Elections) Regulations, 1981.
The regulations contain important provisions such as the following:
- A candidate for a parliamentary seat must submit Form 4 (nomination form) and Form 5 (statutory declaration) while Forms 4A and 5A are for the use of a candidate contesting a state seat.
- The nomination form must be signed by the candidate, his proposer and seconder and the witness who witnesses the signature of the candidate. The proposer and seconder must be registered voters of the constituency for which the candidate seeks election. This requirement does not apply to the witness.
Regulation 4(6) states that the failure to comply with the above shall render the nomination paper to be rejected.
The 1981 regulations also require a candidate to deposit the sum of RM10,000 and RM5,000 when submitting nomination papers for the parliamentary and state seats respectively. The deposit will be forfeited if the candidate fails to secure one-eighth of the total number of votes polled (not inclusive of rejected votes); otherwise the deposit can only be claimed one year later.
Then, the nomination papers (including the original copy of the statutory declaration in Form 5 or 5A, as the case may be), must be submitted in triplicate to the returning officer at the place of nomination between 9am and 10am.
However, the candidate and his proposer or seconder can still make any corrections on the nomination papers before 10am.
As regards the Election Commission's announcement two days ago that the statutory declaration has to be stamped with RM10 duty, I think the decision is unnecessary for the following reasons:
- the law allows any unstamped document to be stamped 30 days after execution (s. 47, Stamp Act 1949);
- if not stamped within 30 days, it can still be stamped later by paying a penalty up to RM100 (s. 47A, Stamp Act 1949; and
- an unstamped document will only be rendered inadmissible as evidence in court but its validity will not be affected (s. 52, Stamp Act 1949).
If the matter goes to court, the candidate can always pay up the stamp duty and penalty before admitting the document in court.
Further, it can also be argued that a statutory declaration in this case is a "declaration in writing" made pursuant to a statute and is therefore exempted from stamp duty under the 1949 Stamp Act. For these reasons, it will be wrong if any nomination is rejected on the ground that the statutory declaration is not stamped.
Thereafter between 10am and 11am, the returning officer will display the nomination papers in a conspicuous position outside the nomination place for examination by the candidates, their proposers, seconders and one other person, if any, appointed by each candidate.
Any registered voter in that constituency or candidate may then object to any nomination paper on any of the above-mentioned grounds only.
The objection must be in writing and signed by the objector.
It must be submitted to the returning officer between 10am and 11am. The returning officer shall decide on the validity of every objection and he may seek the advice of the Attorney-General's Chambers.
The decision of the returning officer shall be final and shall not be called into question in any court. However, any person aggrieved by the returning officer's decision may still challenge it by presenting an election petition under the Election Offences Act 1954. Hence, if any candidate still does not get it right, then maybe he is not fit to be elected.
Sunday, February 24, 2008
Fulfilling the nomination process
Saturday, February 23, 2008
Rush to have forms stamped
The Star
ALOR STAR:- Opposition candidates from Kedah, Terengganu and Kelantan, which observe Friday as a weekly rest day, had to rush to neighbouring states to have the stamp duties on their nomination forms validated by district offices.
PAS information chief Mahfuz Omar said the Election Commission (EC) informed political parties of the new ruling only on Thursday, forcing PAS, PKR and DAP candidates to hurry to other states to get the job done before nomination day tomorrow.
“The commission should not impose last minute rulings that could jeopardise opposition candidates’ right to contest,” he said during press conference to announce the PAS candidates’ list for Kedah yesterday.
It was reported that candidates submitting their nomination papers must have the accompanying statutory declaration stamped, or risk having the papers rejected.
Mahfuz said it was clearly stated on the top right corner of the declaration form, Duti Setem Dikecualikan (Stamp duty exempted).
In Kuala Lumpur, lawyer Roger Tan, who is the Malaysian Bar Council’s Conveyancing Practice Committee chairman, said it was legally wrong to reject any nomination if the statutory declaration was not stamped immediately.
He said the Regulation 4(7) of the Election Regulation (Conduct of Election) 1981 only provided that the original copy of the statutory declaration must be submitted and did not say it had to be stamped.
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
Fiji bans meeting of legal experts
The Australian
QUEENSLAND Supreme Court judge Roslyn Atkinson and a party of international legal experts have been barred from entering Fiji amid growing concern about the legality of the interim Government's actions.
Justice Atkinson had been due to fly to Fiji this week as part of an International Bar Association delegation that had planned to assess the state of the rule of law under the country's interim Government.
But the delegation, which also included Malaysian Bar Council member Roger Tan, has been banned because the Fiji Government says its presence could affect litigation under way in that country.
Fiji Law Society president Isireli Fa said yesterday he believed the real reason for the ban was to prevent international scrutiny of the way the interim Government had been dealing with the country's courts and legal system.
Justice Atkinson said she was very surprised by the attitude of the Fijian Government. "I hope that they reconsider and allow the visit of the IBA to proceed in the interests of openness and accountability," she said.
The incident, which was condemned yesterday by Australian Bar Association president Tom Bathurst QC, coincides with a series of challenges to the actions of the interim Government, which seized power in a military takeover in 2006.
Mr Fa said the interim Government had convened a tribunal and asked it to investigate accusations against Fiji's suspended chief judge Daniel Fatiaki. That tribunal adjourned last week to permit Chief Justice Fatiaki to take separate proceedings to determine the tribunal's jurisdiction.
The Fiji Law Society is running a constitutional challenge to the appointment of judges by the interim Government; and the deposed prime minister Laisenia Qarase is challenging the legality of the 2006 military takeover.
Mr Fa said the Fiji Law Society called on the Australian legal profession and the Australian Government to help it overturn the ban on the IBA delegation.
Foreign Minister Stephen Smith said in a statement last night: "Australia continues to urge the regime to return Fiji to democracy and the rule of law."
Australian Bar Association president Tom Bathurst QC said his organisation condemned the ban on the IBA delegation.
The ban was imposed after correspondence in which Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum told the IBA on February 3: "You are not welcome in Fiji at this time."
Malaysian lawyers criticise Fiji
Radio Australia
A senior Malaysian lawyer says Fiji has missed an opportunity to show its judicial process is above board and there is nothing to hide.
The Fiji Times says the head of the Malaysian Bar, Ambiga Sreenevasan, was commenting on Fiji's refusal to allow a visit by an assessment team from the International Bar Association.
Among those prevented from entering was Malaysian Lawyer Roger Tan.
Earlier, Fiji's interim Attorney General, Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum, said the delegation of international lawyers was not welcome because their presence would undermine the independence of judges hearing high-profile cases.
Malaysian lawyer barred from entering Fiji
The Star
PETALING JAYA: A member of the Malaysian Bar Council who was selected to join an international team to examine the independence of the judiciary in Fiji has been barred from entering the country.
The “stop arrival order” issued by the interim government to border officials at the Nadi International Airport last Friday was effective from yesterday till this Friday.
Senior lawyer Roger Tan said he was supposed to board the flight from here to Sydney en route to Fiji last Saturday evening.
He was part of an International Bar Association (IBA) delegation scheduled to arrive in Fiji on Sunday evening to examine the independence of the judiciary and the state of the rule of law in the country.
PETALING JAYA: A member of the Malaysian Bar Council who was selected to join an international team to examine the independence of the judiciary in Fiji has been barred from entering the country.
The “stop arrival order” issued by the interim government to border officials at the Nadi International Airport last Friday was effective from yesterday till this Friday.
Senior lawyer Roger Tan said he was supposed to board the flight from here to Sydney en route to Fiji last Saturday evening.
He was part of an International Bar Association (IBA) delegation scheduled to arrive in Fiji on Sunday evening to examine the independence of the judiciary and the state of the rule of law in the country.
A check on the Malaysian Bar website revealed that the order also prohibited other members of the delegation – including Justice Roslyn Atkinson of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Australia and Felicia Johnston, from the IBA’s Human Rights Institute – from entering Fiji.
The site reported that Johnston, who arrived in Fiji at 5.30am on Saturday morning from Los Angeles, was unaware of the order when she was denied entry. She left for Brisbane, Australia, seven hours later.
The site quoted Fiji Law Society President Isireli Fa as saying that the action taken by the government was totally unnecessary and had put the country in a bad light.
The site also posted a press release by the IBA yesterday quoting its president Fernando Pombo and executive director Mark Ellis.
While Pombo called on the Fijian interim government to reverse its decision on the bar order, Ellis described the ban as depriving Fijians of “the opportunity to have an open discussion and objective feedback on issues that are clearly of concern for both the country and the international community”.
Malaysian Bar president Ambiga Sreenevasan called the episode “a missed opportunity for the Fiji government to show that its judicial process is above board and that they have nothing to hide”.
“I am confident that the IBA will be very professional and neutral in its observations as they are highly experienced in undertaking missions of this sort,” she said.
Fiji, which achieved independence in 1970, has been affected by several military coups; the most recent being in December 2006.
The site quoted Fiji Law Society President Isireli Fa as saying that the action taken by the government was totally unnecessary and had put the country in a bad light.
The site also posted a press release by the IBA yesterday quoting its president Fernando Pombo and executive director Mark Ellis.
While Pombo called on the Fijian interim government to reverse its decision on the bar order, Ellis described the ban as depriving Fijians of “the opportunity to have an open discussion and objective feedback on issues that are clearly of concern for both the country and the international community”.
Malaysian Bar president Ambiga Sreenevasan called the episode “a missed opportunity for the Fiji government to show that its judicial process is above board and that they have nothing to hide”.
“I am confident that the IBA will be very professional and neutral in its observations as they are highly experienced in undertaking missions of this sort,” she said.
Fiji, which achieved independence in 1970, has been affected by several military coups; the most recent being in December 2006.
Monday, February 18, 2008
Fiji misses opportunity: Malaysian lawyer
The Fiji Times
FIJI has missed an opportunity to show its judicial process is above board and they have nothing to hide as the International Bar Association was very neutral in their observations and were highly experienced.
Malaysian Bar President, Ambiga Sreenevasan made the comment on the Malaysian Bars website in reaction to the barring of members of the International Bar Association members from travelling to Fiji to conduct an independent assessment.
"I am confident that the IBA will be very professional and neutral in its observations as they are highly experienced in undertaking missions of this sort", Mr Ambiga said.
Malaysian Lawyer Roger Tan was barred from entering Fiji after the interim government issued a stop arrival order to border officials at the Nadi International Airport last Friday prohibiting him from entering the country.
The order prohibits Tan, Peter Maynard, Justice Roslyn Atkinson, Felicia Johnston and Cecelia Burgman from entering the country and it is effective from the 18th to the 22nd of this month.
Tan is the Chair of the Conveyancing Practice Committee of the Malaysian Bar Council.
He holds a Bachelor of Laws with Honours from Queen Mary College of the University of London, and a Master of Laws from the National University of Singapore.
On January 30, interim Attorney General of Fiji, Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum said the IBA Human Rights Insitute was not welcome to visit Fiji now because their presence would undermine the independence of judges hearing high-profile cases.
Tan, who was supposed to board the flight from Malaysia to Sydney en route to Fiji yesterday evening.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)